Toyota Marketing Strategy Marketing Essay

Jesus had a special mission to the marginalised Essay Example

Jesus had an exceptional strategic the minimized Essay Jesus had an extraordinary crucial the underestimated clarify this utilizing models from the gospel, and state why this incited an antagonistic response from some Jews.A minimized individual is somebody who out of the blue is on the edge of society.Jesus consistently had an uncommon spot in the hearts of all the minimized individuals he interacted with. Jesus job was in every case clear. He treated all of the minimized as he would have jumped at the chance to have been dealt with himself.In Jesus time many individuals were underestimated simply like in todays society, for exampleLepers were minimized they were viewed as untouchables in their locale in light of their feared skin infection. Affliction was regularly observed as discipline from God for sin.Tax gatherers were underestimated they were viewed as untouchables in their own locale since they frequently bamboozled individuals into accepting they needed to pay more cash for charge. Individuals don't care for being cheated out of hard earned cash and that is the reason individuals once in a while associated with these duty collectors.Samaritans were underestimated they were viewed as pariahs in their own locale since they had hitched agnostic trespassers, and they had constructed their own Temple on Mount Gerezim.An case of how Jesus treated the minimized is in the story (Luke 5: 12-14) Jesus recuperates an untouchable Jesus was in a town were there was a man with a feared skin infection. At the point when the man saw Jesus he hurled himself down at Jesus feet and asked Sir in the event that you need to u can make me clean Jesus answered I would like to, be perfect the malady left the man and Jesus said Dont reveal to anyoneAnother model Jesus set for us in our treatment of the underestimated is (Luke 18: 35-53) Jesus recuperates a Blind Beggar who has confidence A visually impaired man heard that Jesus was passing and he shouted out to Jesus child of David! Have compassion for me, he was advised to stay si lent by the group, however he yelled much stronger. Jesus heard his cry and said what do you need me to accomplish for you? he said I need to see again Jesus answered then observe, your confidence has made you well he could see again, and followed Jesus expressing gratefulness to God.The Jews could never connect with these individuals and when they saw that a man named the Messiah did this bewildered and irritated them greately.As these two models show Jesus treated every single minimized individual that he interacted with a ton of regard and love. We should attempt to follow this model Jesus has set for us all.Jesus demeanor for an amazing duration frequently incited an antagonistic response from certain Jews, as he would regularly challenge their laws and lifestyle. He denounced their conduct towards each other and this disappointed them extraordinarily. They felt Jesus was a danger to their great name, and they set about evolving this. A case of how Jesus would outrage them is (L uke 14: 1-24) Jesus recuperates a wiped out man on the Sabbath Jesus was at a main Pharisees house and individuals were watching him intently. A man whose legs and arms were swollen came to Jesus asking to get recuperated. So Jesus said to the Pharisee Does our law permit recuperating on the Sabbath or not? the Pharisee couldn't answer Jesus at that point mended the man and sent him on.The Pharisees were taking a gander at Jesus and he said to them on the off chance that anybody of you had a child or bull fall into the well on the Sabbath would you not haul him out without a moment's delay? they couldn't respond to this inquiry. Jesus regularly put the Pharisees in positions this way, and after some time they got so insulted that they plotted to get Jesus killed. The Pharisees and different strict pioneers of this time were not as acceptable hearted as Jesus, and they couldnt contend with him. They blamed him for lewdness and this is the reason he insulted them and caused an antagon istic response.

Essay Topics to Consider for Your Final Project

Essay Topics to Consider for Your Final ProjectIn this lesson, you'll find some of the best essay competiton topics that you can use for your final project. These topics will allow you to test yourself against a challenging selection of essay topics, while maintaining the requirements of the competition.Essays are intended to offer students with knowledge and insight that they will not find in their daily life. They are not short pieces of writing where students have to take their time to write a few sentences. They are meant to be in depth and powerful statements that address a number of problems. Essay writing is not easy, and it is important to understand that the essay has to be done well before it is accepted for the competition.Competitions require students to come up with essay topics that are thoughtful and articulate. These topics should be related to the topic of the competition and reflective of the students' strengths. The essay topics should also make an impact on the ju dges and audience. The best essay topics are some of the most important considerations in the competition.First, it is essential to recognize that essay topics are inherently wide ranging. A paper may cover numerous subjects in a variety of different contexts. Most students choose to focus on one subject or one aspect of a particular subject. Students should therefore consider taking on more than one topic for their final project.Second, there is a risk of rewriting and reworking that often comes with the competition. It is essential that students consider that they may have difficulty writing the introduction, and the thesis statement, if they are already struggling with another topic. Therefore, students should take the time to work through all of their previous work before moving forward. Students should consider writing a new introduction and adding new material to the statement, if they have not written it in the past. This could be accomplished by taking notes, writing an outl ine, and then working through the paper.Third, there is a danger of writing a long essay that is not well written. A longer essay, especially one that involves several specific topics, will likely be more difficult to write and edit. Students should avoid writing papers that are overly lengthy.Essays should also address a number of important topics in the course. For example, if the competition is to examine the benefits of a law school, there are many topics that the students should look at. It is imperative that students approach each topic with an analytical mind and avoid getting distracted by fluff and filler.All in all, choosing the best essay topics for the final project is necessary. This selection is vital in order to maintain the requirements of the competition. Essay topics should be chosen with care in order to ensure the validity of the essay, and that the essay is successful as it was written.

What Is a Science Fair

A science fair is an event where people, usually students, present the results of their scientific investigations. Science fairs often are competitions, though they may be ​informational presentations, depending on the topic. Most science fairs take place at the elementary and secondary educational levels, though other age and educational levels may be involved. Origins of Science Fairs in the United States Science fairs are held in many countries. In the United States, science fairs trace their beginning back to E.W. Scripps Science Service, which was founded in 1921. The Science Service was a nonprofit organization that sought to increase awareness and interest in science by explaining scientific concepts in nontechnical terms. The Science Service published a weekly bulletin, which ultimately became a weekly news magazine. In 1941, sponsored by Westinghouse Electric Manufacturing Company, the Science Service helped to organize Science Clubs of America, a national science club which held its first national science fair in Philadelphia in 1950.

Mandatory Vaccination free essay sample

Hence, there has been political issue (since this is â€Å"linked to some vision of reordering society†) on immunization against the government whether they should enforce mandatory vaccination; especially in country where the health-care is regulated by the government (Dickerson, Flanagan amp; O’Neill, 2008). The purpose of this paper is to support the stance of voluntary vaccination program in which the government should respect individual rights and freedoms according the Code of Ethics as well as Charter of Rights and Freedom, while providing the best informed resources about immunization to the public. Vaccines are promise of protection for everyone regardless of age; however, individuals’ decision on vaccination should be respected, particularly in democratic countries. Immunization/ Vaccination Bacteria, germs, and virus are the source of infections which are widely spread. Potter and Perry (2010) stated that immunization is the process by which resistance to a transferable disease is formed or improved via vaccination. With vaccine injections people are protected from diseases and improve body’s immune system (Public Health, 2007). According to the Unite for Children (2012), â€Å"immunization works by tricking the body into believing it is experiencing a full-scale invasion by an infectious agent so that the immune system can fortify its defenses†. When the vaccine is injected, dead microorganisms known as antigens are introduced to the body and the immune system fight against the antigens by producing â€Å"disease-fighting substances† known as antibodies (World Book, 2012). Subsequently, a â€Å"memory of this ‘invasion’ remains so that the immune system can quickly recognize and neutralize disease-causing agents when they appear† (Unite for Children, 2012). According to Potter and Perry (2010), common uses of immunizations have brought dramatic decline in infectious diseases since the 1950s and proved the rationale why it is the most important factor in health promotion from newborns to seniors. It is true that vaccination provides health promotion and disease prevention, but several lethal downsides have been identified as side effects. Points of the Argument Examination of existing contents reveals two main arguments to be supported or opposed in the question of whether vaccination program should be mandatory. Beliefs and Values of Democracy. Opponents of voluntary vaccination program argue that it is the state’s responsibility to take care of public’s health by establishing mandatory vaccination. However, in democratic countries where the government â€Å"in which the people rule themselves† such as in Canada, individual rights and freedom are valued and such values are protected by the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom (Pocklington, 1994). According to the legal rights in Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom, everyone has the right to life and liberty (Department of Justice, 2012). If the government set up mandatory vaccination program by taking away the promise of the rights to life and liberty from the individuals leaving them with no freedom and liberation, this would violate the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom under the Canadian law. Some individuals do not acquire vaccination or any immunization according to their religious beliefs. Moreover, when vaccination becomes mandatory to everyone, this would interfere with and violate individuals’ â€Å"freedom of conscience and religion† as recorded in the Charter of Rights and Freedom (Department of Justice, 2012). Since the policy of mandatory vaccination contravenes the rules of the Charter of Rights and Freedom, until now no government policy has established mandatory vaccination under the Canadian law. Ethical Concern. In public health care in which the system is regulated by the government, health care providers such as nurses are obligated to comply with the regulations and rules such as Code of Ethics in the health care system. Health care providers are obligated to promote and respect informed decision- making of their clients (Canadian Nursing Association, 2008). Especially, according to the Code of Ethics, â€Å"nurses are ought to recognize, respect and promote a person’s right to be informed and make decisions† (Canadian Nursing Association, 2008). They should be able to respect â€Å"the right to refuse or withdraw consent for care or treatment at any time† (Canadian Nursing Association, 2008). However, if immunization becomes mandatory, the nurses (as union workers) would be violating the Code of Ethics and implementing unethical practice by enforcing treatment to their clients. In health care: The most important right that patients possess is the right of self-determination, the right to make the ultimate decision concerning what will or will not be done to their bodies. This right, embodied in the informed consent doctrine, has a critical and essential corollary: the right to refuse treatment (American Journal of Public Health, 1983). Edda West (coordinator for the Vaccination Risk Awareness Network) stated that it is important to be cautious and â€Å"always be left to the discretion of the patient, or the patient’s parents in terms of a minor† when dealing with invasive and insidious â€Å"medical procedure of any kind that carry a risk of injury and death† and especially vaccinations â€Å"should never be made mandatory because they carry the risk of injury and death and are essentially ‘experimental’† (as cited in Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2011). Experimental does not necessarily refer being experimented on human life since it is unethical and an illegal act; but it signifies the potential lethal consequences that released vaccines may generate. Social concern. Supporters of mandatory vaccination program may argue about bringing forth more improvement of disease prevention by enforcing everyone getting vaccinated. Dr. Ian Gemmill (past chair of the Canadian Coalition of Immunization Awareness and Promotion) stated that â€Å"There are some circumstances, like schoolchildren [and] for sure, health care workers, where there are compelling arguments that can be made and should be respected around requiring people to be immunized. But it’s not true for every single vaccine and every single circumstance. † (as cited in Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2011). For instance, special circumstances for someone â€Å"who works in a health care service should be required to be vaccinated on the grounds that they are in a position to put vulnerable people at risk and could be knocked out during a pandemic† (Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2011). It is agreeable to certain extent vaccinations are required to specific population such as health care employees to prevent the spread of disease during the outbreak. However this does not mean every single individual in Canada must be vaccinated by enforcement of mandatory vaccination program. Government’s Interference with Decision-Making of Individuals. Some may argue that the public is not capable of making accurate decision regarding immunization or vaccination. Therefore mandatory vaccination should be enforced to everyone for disease prevention and health promotion. However there are no proofs of the public making unintelligent decision, especially when it comes to matters of dealing with their health. It is undeniable in certain circumstances where individuals are misinformed about various aspects of vaccination and decide to wait longer or some may never get vaccinated. In this case, individuals must be able to separate the facts and fiction about immunization and make right decisions for their selves. For instance, there are claims about vaccines being the cause of autism or sudden infant death syndrome (SIDS). However, Public Health Agency of Canada (2012) has stated that professional research committees in Canada and across nations have examined reports of severe results over long periods of time and they have found no proof of a link between vaccines and autism or any other illnesses. For people to gain true facts about vaccines, they need to reach credible researches from credible resources with current information from websites such as www. healthcanada. ca or updated new articles or news. Doctor Gemmill counters that governments and health care professionals must standardize the facts and untruths on the Internet (as cited in Canadian Medical Association Journal, 2011). The government may publicize a web site or health links with information on vaccination or any information on health promotion; moreover through the media as well. The government may also fund health promotion teams in the health care facility to educate and create programs similar with ‘Tobacco free kids’ for parents and individuals through school or work. Ultimately by gaining access to accurate information and credible resources, it is up to the public to be immunized or not. Ever since vaccination has been produced, it has proven itself of being effective in preventing disease and in health promotion. This also indicates that, even if the vaccination is not mandatory, the majority of the population choose to get immunized and prevent diseases. Therefore, mandatory vaccination is not necessary to maintain health promotion since individuals are left to make right choices for their own good. With adequate and truthful information about immunization, mandatory vaccination program is unnecessary to persuade the majority to be vaccinated. Conclusion. Immunizations are among the victorious public health involvement in preventing â€Å"morbidity, mortality and health care costs† (Salmon, 2002). Through immunization many lives were saved and were possible to preserve human race. It is true vaccination is effective in preventing disease and promoting health. However, individuals’ rights and freedom should be protected with respect according to the laws of Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedom as well as the Code of Ethics. Enforcing mandatory vaccination program means carrying out an illegal act by violating the laws mentioned above. The government is entitled to provide its citizens with adequate information on immunization for better health promotion and disease prevention.

Write about the significance of the way Auden writes about characters Essay Example

Write about the significance of the way Auden writes about characters Essay Auden utilises poetry to access and describe all that is latent within society and condemn those who outcast others because of their prejudicial mindset. He comments on various situations, all of which come to represent people who do not have the true ability to speak out against the problems they endure because of the lack of attention they receive if they do. All the environments in which they are placed symbolise the cruel, impersonal, perhaps even callous nature of humanity as they seek to deal with problems which involve individuals own self-interests, and therefore, are reluctant to accept the problems of others as being of the same merit as theirs. Auden feels that it is his due civil responsibility to voice his concerns about this and he does so convincingly conveying the emotional and psychological weight and consequence of the problems that these people have to deal with. However, contrary to making the audience empathise with the individual characters, Auden invites us to be amused at their circumstances, to laugh at their lack of worthiness. It is through this method that we soon realise the problems we have in identifying with people in less desirable situations and we begin to recognise the problems that society, as a whole, has in the way it tries to understand people such as Miss Gee. In Miss Gee, Auden, in my opinion, inappropriately uses the ballad form to bring to light the tragic story of Edith Gee. Her characteristics (she had no bust at all, her lips were thin and small) are used to illustrate the nature of someone that we all can recognise in our own lives. She has qualities which deem her an introvert (lived in a small bed-sitting room) and perhaps even an outcast (shed a left squint in her eye). She then goes on to yearn for the love and affection that passed her whole adult life by; she dreams of the local vicar (And the Vicar of Saint Aloysius / Asked her Majesty to dance) and feels nothing but contempt for loving couples, who in themselves could represent the people that have held her back her whole life, the ones who have been critical of her mere existence or maybe it is just the simple reference back to her lack of romantic experience. We will write a custom essay sample on Write about the significance of the way Auden writes about characters specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now We will write a custom essay sample on Write about the significance of the way Auden writes about characters specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer We will write a custom essay sample on Write about the significance of the way Auden writes about characters specifically for you FOR ONLY $16.38 $13.9/page Hire Writer Almost as if by fate, she is diagnosed with cancer shortly after this that may be representative of the illness that plagues society (the nature of which they hate so freely) and, indeed, Edith could have taken on the persona of the general public and the cancer might be retribution for the way in which they act. From this point onwards, there is a transfer of focus onto Doctor Thomas whose insensitive approach to his job even irritates his wife (Dont be so morbid, dear). He invites her to the hospital for an operation and she is ruthlessly used as a learning tool, as if she is has no worth at all. Suddenly, we feel increasingly regretful for our earlier bemusement and seek to rescue her from the fate that has befallen her life, but it is too late. We cannot save her. It is disturbing to think that if the parish spinster who is rewarded for her life of sexual propriety with an emphatic and inoperable sarcoma, then what is to happen to us? The remarkable difference between the use of the ballad form (+ ACBC rhyme scheme) and the tragic nature of this story in itself represents the failure of society to meet its responsibilities to look after those who are less fortunate and less able to become fulfilled by living normal lives. The people in O What Is That Sound are characterised by the way in which they interact the dismissive and even unsympathetic temperament of the character who speaks in the latter lines of each stanza enables us to fully understand the situation of the person who speaks in the first lines. The characters are specifically identified because they come to represent the ambiguity and universality of the situation. A consistent tone is taken throughout the piece aside from one line in which the 2nd characters annoyance seems to shine through (or perhaps a warning). Her naivety is glaringly obvious and, similarly to other poems by Auden, this could represent the ignorance of society to threats on their doorstep because they are merely that, threats. They do not immediately have an effect and so we are willing to ignore them in order to carry on with our lives until they do become a problem; Auden, however, feels strongly against this. He maintains that we should prepare for the worst even we do not see it coming. This is wholly embodied in the 2nd character that deserts their partner for fear of their own life; irrespective of the matrimonial vows they swore to abide by. On a simpler level, the betrayal and introduction of war could purely stand for the betrayal that the 2nd character was going to make all along; war was always an approaching prospect and the desertion planned (I must be leaving he has already considered the eventualities). We gather from the introduction of long-term themes, that the 1st character has always had a sense of abandonment and isolation within their marriage. They have not had the entire support of their partner and they are disappointed in the lack of moral fibre that comprises their personality. With reference to Auden, as a social critic, perhaps this story serves a multi-functionary purpose; he may be critical of the role of marriage in society and how that the standards expected of both man and woman are impossibly high, so as to ensure that failure will result in some circumstances. Hes trying to prove through the characters that the very qualities we traditionally deem to form the foundations for a society that w e can depend on, one that wont betray us have been wrong all along. He even goes as far as to mock religion in the way it has helped implement a repressive but socially-acceptable mindset in people why are you kneeling? Alternatively, the characters may serve as a metaphor for his disgust at the lack of leadership in politics at the time the poem was composed, given the way in which the people readily submit to the army of a foreign country (i.e. a reference to the Chamberlain appeasement of Hitlers Third Reich). The first person narrative used in 1st September 1939 effectively means that Auden is the narrator of the poem and we can therefore see that the point comes directly from him, as opposed to a character that he has created. In a similar fashion to the other poems that he has composed, Auden uses 1st September to criticise the way in which society operates and how its self-indulgent attitude leaves many others out in the cold when it comes to needing help. Although the narrator appears to be very well versed in historical figures (and therefore suggests that he is of noble birth), Auden dismisses his inherited wealth as he comes to realise that strength should lie in the Collective Man who should live for long / in a euphoric dream whilst maintaining their love for another. Various statements in the poem lead us to believe that poet is trying to answer the questions prompted by war, such as, how did we get there in the first place? He locates blame in those who have imperialist tendenc ies, corrupting the very democracy them claim to represent. They have ignored the plight of the workers and their impersonal approach to the war, because of the fact that the only scar they will bear will lie in their ego, is completely indictable. Their competitive excuses, their dishonesty, the driv[ing] of a culture mad and the stupor lies all should make us want to rise up against such blatant disregard for our welfare, but Auden, through his character, negates this theme by implying that violence isnt fought with through other violence. We have to show an affirming flame, and Audens voice I will be true to my wife leads us to believe that he will be the figurehead of such a tidal movement against the stalemate of complacency. He must, at least, stay true to his message, because that is what will set him apart from the deceptive militant trash.

Understanding Case in English Grammar

Understanding Case in English Grammar So what is this thing called case in English, anyway? And why is it important? Being pretty clueless about this aspect of grammar is pretty common: When teachers or editors discuss the importance of getting  case  right in English grammar, quizzical looks from listeners are often the result. But not to worry. Heres a simple explanation: Basically, the concept of case in English is the grammatical relationship of nouns and pronouns to other words in a sentence. In English, nouns have only one case inflection: the possessive (or genitive). The case of nouns other than the possessive is sometimes called the common case. Common case nouns are the basic word, such as dog, cat, sunset or water. Pronouns have three case distinctions: Subjective (or nominative)Possessive (or genitive)Objective (or accusative) Examples and Observations on Case Sidney Greenbaum discusses this basic subject of English grammar in Case in The Oxford Companion to the English Language (1992). Potentially, countable nouns have four case forms: two singular (child, childs), two plural (children, childrens). In regular nouns, these manifest themselves only in writing, through the apostrophe ( girl, girls, girls, girls), since in speech three of the forms are identical. The genitive [or possessive] case is used in two contexts: dependently, before a noun ( This is Toms/his bat), and independently ( This bat is Toms/his). Most personal pronouns have different forms for the dependent and independent genitive: This is your bat and This bat is yours. The genitive case forms of personal pronouns are often called possessive pronouns. A few pronouns have three cases: subjective or nominative, objective or accusative, and genitive or possessive.Andrea Lunsford gives tips on editing for case in The St. Martins Handbook (2008). In compound structures, make su re pronouns are in the same case they would be in if used alone (Jake and she were living in Spain). When a pronoun follows than or as, complete the sentence mentally. If the pronoun is the subject of an unstated verb, it should be in the subjective case (I like her better than he [likes her]). If it is the object of an unstated verb, it should be in the objective case (I like her better than [I like] him.). Robert Lane Greene talks about the disappearance of case endings in English in his book You Are What You Speak   (2011). While the stickler might see the misuse and gradual disappearance of whom as proof that education and society have been flushed down the toilet, most linguists   even though they will almost certainly use whom in their written work themselves see the pronouns replacement with who as merely another step in Englishs gradual shedding of case endings. In the era of Beowulf, English nouns had endings that showed what role they played in the sentence, as Latin did. But nearly all of them disappeared by the time of Shakespeare, and a linguist would see the death of whom as simply the conclusion of the process.